Our Collection

At the Institute’s core is the Gilder Lehrman Collection, one of the great archives in American history. More than 70,000 items cover five hundred years of American history, from Columbus’s 1493 letter describing the New World to soldiers’ letters from World War II and Vietnam. Explore primary sources, visit exhibitions in person or online, or bring your class on a field trip.

Knox, Henry (1750-1806) to George Washington

High-resolution images are available to schools and libraries via subscription to American History, 1493-1943. Check to see if your school or library already has a subscription. Or click here for more information. You may also request a pdf of the image from us here.

Gilder Lehrman Collection #: GLC02437.00805 Author/Creator: Knox, Henry (1750-1806) Place Written: Morristown, New Jersey Type: Manuscript letter Date: 29 March 1780 Pagination: 3 p. : docket ; 33.6 x 20.7 cm.

Summary of Content: Written in the hand of Samuel Shaw, and signed by him for Knox'. Knox advises against sending troops from the northern Continental force "to the southward ... supposing the events at Charlestown [Charleston, South Carolina] to prove unfortunate." Writes, "The great number of negroes and disaffected people in North and South Carolina will always render the conquest of that country comparatively easy with the more northern parts of the continent... But I cannot think it obligatory on Your Excellency to detach any troops at present from your small army; especially as you will be necessitated to garrison West Point with parts of it..." Asserts that maintenance of the Hudson River posts should take precedence over other military concerns. Comments on the possible outcomes of a British attack on West Point. Writes, "The enemy by being in possession of the water, have it amply in their power to distress and harass us; but it would be highly imprudent and unwise in us to divide our force so as to be incapable of making opposition in any place... I think therefore it would be rather improper at present to detach any troops because the situation of the force under Your Excellency relative to that of the enemy in New York would not permit it-" Argues that the militia in North and South Carolina should turn out to assist the Continental Army.

Full Transcript: [Draft]
Morris Town, 29 March 1780
Sir,
I have endeavored to consider in every point of view the important information which your Excellency gave your general officers yesterday, and the question arising ...from it, viz. Whether any troops should be detatched from this army to the Southward, with a view of forming a force to cover the country, supposing the event at Charlestown to prove unfortunate?
An addition of continental troops to the Southward would certainly be a matter devoutly to be wished. The great number of negroes and disaffected people in North & South Carolina will always render the conquest of the country comparatively easy with the more northern parts of the continent, and are circumstances, added to others which might be named, that loudly demand assistance from the neighbouring States. But however forcible the demands are on these States, I cannot think it obligatory on Your Excellency to detach any troops at present from your finale army; especially as you will be necissitated to garrison West Point with parts of it, and will lose a very large proportion by the expiration of the mens engagements before the first of June. The present prospects of recruits or levies made, on the expaitation of having it speedily replaced by them.
The posts on Hudson's river have hitherto been regarded, by every person of judgement as the object of the greatest magnitude on the continent, and the maintanence of which every thing else ought to give place. Were the garrison at West Point and its dependences complete, and left to rely upon itself and the support it could derive from the assistance of the militia, without the possibility of aid from the continental army, I do think its safety would be extremely precarious, if besieged by ten thousand regular troops. It appears by your Excellency's estimates, the enemy at [2] New York would bring that number against it in 12 hours, had they nothing to apprehend from the continental army. The defence of New York could be entrusted to a very few regular troops and the militia of the islands in their possession, assisted by the shipping.
The grounds in the vicinity of our works at West Point are such, that should they be suddenly seized on by the enemy, it would require more vigourous exertions to dispossess them than are commonly made by militia. Probably the place and its stores are incapable of sustaining more than twenty five or thirty days [inserted: close] siege. If so, and the object is of the first consequence on the continent it follows that a body of disciplined troops ought to be so near as to afford it relief in the above mentioned time, or the place would fall into the enemy's hands, - an event to be feared, in proportion to its importance and the difficulties of recovering it again.
From the information which your Excellency gives us, it is probable that your army by the first of June will be scarcely sufficient for the purposes [struck: of] for the garrison of Hudson's river, and to curb the incursions [inserted: of parties] of the enemy. The importance of the operations to the Southward is so great, that were we certain of receiving as many new recruits and new levies by the first of June as would supply the place of the Maryland line, I should be for that line or a body of troops equal to it, marching to the Southward, but not until the designs of the enemy were more unfolded than at present - such as, whether they intend to send more troops from New York to Charleston, whether they intend to undertake the conquest of that place only as a desirable object to obtain a favorable peace - or, whether they intend [struck: intend] it as a preliminary step to an attempt to subjugate the Southern States. Their intentions in these respects being fully known would enable me to be much more decisive in my opinion than I can be at present. The enemy, by being in possession of the water, have it amply in their power to distress and harrass us; but it would be highly imprudent and unwise in us to divide our force so as to be incapable of making opposition in [3] any place.
Were a body of troops today to be ordered to be in readiness to march, it would be ten or fifteen days at least before they could comply and begin their march. The distance from here to Charleston is reputed to be 900 miles. Were the troops to march 12 miles one day with another including the halting days, bad weather, crossing ferries and other contingencies, they would not perform the march in less than 75 days, which would bring it to the latter end of June, a season in which it is said to be almost impracticable for troops to act in that climate.
I think therefore it would be rather improper at present to detatch any troops, because the situation of the force under Your Excellency relative to that of the enemy in New York would not permit it - that the designs of the enemy are not sufficiently known with respect to transfering the principal stress of the war to the Southward, and because, that were any troops to be ordered immediately, they would not arrive in time to operate before the hot months would come on.
I have said nothing of the comparative strength of the Southern militia with that of the Northern, because Your Excellency cannot rely for a certainty on having any but continental troops. There have been times when the militia have been obliged by the distresses of war to turn out - and the time now is when the Militia of North & South Carolina and Virginia ought to exert themselves. And if the different States will compleate their respective quotas of continental troops according to the direction of Congress, Your Excellency may find it possible to detatch to the Southward a respectible force - : but under the present circumstances, I think disgrace, and perhaps ruin, would attend such a measure.

I have the honor to be with the
highest respect
Your Excellencys most
obedt Servt.
H Knox
Copy

His Excellency
Gen. Washington

[docket]
Copy
An opinion
delivered to his Excly
Genl Washington
29th March 1780
See More

People: Knox, Henry, 1750-1806
Washington, George, 1732-1799
Shaw, Samuel, 1754-1794

Historical Era: American Revolution, 1763-1783

Subjects: African American HistoryRevolutionary WarRevolutionary War GeneralMilitary HistoryContinental ArmyPresidentBattleSlaveryWest Point (US Military Academy)Global History and US Foreign PolicyGlobal History and US Foreign PolicyNavyMilitia

Sub Era: The War for Independence

Order a Copy Citation Guidelines for Online Resources